A Short History of Plumbing, Toilets, and Sanitation

In 1856, East Indian Railway Company workers summoned General Alexander Cunningham to the Indus River Valley site, where they had uncovered the ruins of an ancient city. The archaeologists who had rushed to the scene were stunned—as archaeologists digging under the auspices of the British Empire were wont to be—by the sophistication of the civilization the workers had begun to uncover. One particular point of interest was the complex system of underground brick lined sewage drains, complete with running water and rudimentary flush toilets.

To put it in different terms, these British archaeologists uncovered a civilization which had had an underground sewage system circa the third millennium BCE in the same year that the city at the seat of the British Empire—London—had begun to experience the sanitation problems which would lead to the “Great Stink” of 1858.


“Father Thames Introducing His Offspring (Diptheria, Scrofula, and Cholera) to the Fair City of London,” originally published in the July 3, 1858 edition of Punch Magazine. Image courtesy of the Museum of London.

In the 1850s, the modern flush toilet began to replace the chamber pot in the daily waste disposal of many Londoners. This increased the volume of waste being poured into cesspits, which often overflowed into the streets, overwhelming the medieval drainage system, and emptied into the Thames. The unusual heat levels of the summer of 1858 merged with the bacteria in the sewage-filled waters of the Thames to produce a stench so overwhelming that the House of Commons nearly shut down.

Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro weren’t the only ancient cities to have a finer grasp on the intricacies of sanitation than the capital of the British Empire.

The sewage of Rome and Istanbul is still partially carried through 1000+ year old pipes, and the first inverted siphon system (u-shaped pipes for those of us who are not engineers) was put into use in the palaces of Crete over 3000 years ago. Those pipes are still in working condition. The Ancient Minoan peoples had a stone sewage system periodically flushed with clean water, and flush toilets dating to around the mid-second millennium BCE have been found in the Minoan archaeological site of Akrotiri.

In the mid-12th century CE the Arab, or possibly Kurdish, engineer Al-Jazari invented a hand-washing device which made use of flush technology (he also invented the first water supply system to be driven by gears and hydropower, and a robot boy band among other things).


Illustration of his water-raising device from Al-Jazari’s work, The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices. Image courtesy of the Topkapi Palace Museum.

In 1596, Sir John Harington developed a forerunner to the modern toilet and had it installed in his house. He also had one installed for his godmother, Queen Elizabeth I, but she refused to use it because the noise freaked her out.

By the 1850’s, the flush toilet had become a standard fixture in the homes of the bourgeoisie, leading to many much needed updates to old and overburdened sewage systems.

And because I’ve been picking on Britain a lot in this post, I will say that a 31st century BCE hydraulic waste removal system was discovered in one of Britain’s oldest known Neolithic villages: Skara Brae, Orkney. Way to remove that waste, Skara Brae.

Queen Regent Rani Mangammal: Shirking Tradition and Maintaining Territory in the face of the Mughal Empire

In 1682, Queen Mangammal (d. 1704) of the southern Indian kingdom of Madurai Nayak did the unthinkable: she abstained from becoming a Suttee–a widow immolates herself during or after her husband’s funeral. Instead of burning herself during or after her husband’s funeral, she took over his kingdom.

Mangammal’s father had been a high ranking officer in the army of Chokkanatha Nayak, the ruler of the Madurai Nayak kingdom. To honor his service, Chokkanatha chose Mangammal as one of his wives; she became his principal wife after his attempts to marry the daughter of a neighboring ruler failed.

Chokkanatha died in 1682, and the son he’d had with Mangammal ascended the throne. However, their son’s reign was short-lived; he followed his father to the grave in 1689, leaving behind an infant son as his heir, and a widow who would become a Suttee against the wishes of her mother-in-law.

To Mangammal–a widowed, former principal wife left alone with her grandson, the infant heir to the throne–the next logical step was to appoint herself as the Queen Regent. So, she did.

She faced many challenges as she took up the throne, especially as a woman who had shirked the traditions expected of a woman of her Brahmin status. Indeed, her subjects were quite resistant to her rule as she took up the throne, but as time went on, she proved herself to be a brilliant ruler and diplomat, and won her subjects over with the many temples and roads she built in order to improve the kingdom’s infrastructure.

External challenges, however, could not be dealt with through road building. Due to the positioning of the Madurai kingdom between the vast Mughal Empire and many other small kingdoms, she had to be an excellent diplomat in order to ensure the continued security and sovereignty of her kingdom. In this too she was successful. In fact, she was such a skilled politician that she actually regained some of the power and prestige the Madurai Nayak kingdom had lost over the last 30 or 40 years. Mangammal also served as an extremely competent commander-in-chief during times of war.

However, when her grandson came of age in 1704, Mangammal, like many a brilliant female regent before her, refused to abdicate. Her grandson responded to this by, with the help of his generals, locking her in the palace prison and slowly starving her to death. Hardly an end befitting such a brilliant, trailblazing woman.

She remains the most remembered and beloved of the Nayak rulers, and the temples she built are still in use today. One of her temples is currently home to the Gandhi Museum.